They are saying something but they didn’t have to get to that way of expression. Because Anna did not know the details plus Tina acts including others, she concludes it’s SMCH. She didn’t know me enough background etc…
You can sue you wish that under democracy worlds your constitutional right be valid with or without guys, true. Especially with the money. You wish more of you don’t slaves.
Title and power guys are illusion but you prefer that like you the way you are and knowing that values internal stuffs. Speaking the same language - common interest.
I will personally tell you, none of that are the common interests between you and the guys. Not the witch crafts, not ABCDEFG all that.
You say you cannot even verbalize what it means, you know all the saying. It’s tricks and played.
No, I cannot be your lawyers. I am not Eric major. There are the women supporting groups. You wish these cases by elevating the women right in the costs of eternity lose the guys, if with the money, of course you willing. These cases combine will help you and all women forever lose the guys. Forever !
If you make them read at the database, the UB law librarian database it’s every laws society uses including the lawyers. You publicly making that as a case, instead of just vent on the internet…like talking none sense. “I don’t like that guys do that to me”.
When you pay a money to file a lawsuit, through legal court and won. It will forever stays in the computer data base across America to whole wide world including China one day they open the database. It’s democracy under they can freely cited your cases to clear their name and choices. And divorced cases.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🇺🇸🇺🇸😎😎
No comments:
Post a Comment